“Experimental Psycholinguistics” was the course, during my life as an
SLP doctoral student, that separated girl from woman – man from boy. Three
hours of grind on a Monday afternoon almost always began with the professor standing
pensively at his podium, saying “What I want to do….”. There were no rows of
laptops or tablets, all radiating
readiness at that cue. The coffee was cheap and not the robust blends from
far-flung corners of the world, but spat out instead by the one vending machine
for one square block. Though we digested tons of theory and argued reams of
hypotheses, it was that professor’s invocation to the class I remember most
vividly.
Flashback to the middle of that decade: I had begun graduate school on
what was a non-traditional track. I didn’t feel I knew what therapy was all
about. I had done well in methods courses. I had assisted other clinicians with
their cases. My core communication sciences and disorders (CSD) courses were
stimulating and making me want more. Sprinting around a child-sized table to
refocus a child who suddenly bolted from the table, panting and flush with
mortification – no, that was not great assisting! Stimuli presentation? I could do that. Data collection? I
did that after some practice. Maintaining focus and flow of the session? Most of the time I crashed and burned badly
while trying that. I wished I had had,
amongst the clinic supervisors and faculty, somewhere in my group of peers –
someone to be Linus to my Charlie Brown and say,” I can tell you what therapy
is all about. “
A few years had elapsed when, one day at my first job after the master’s
degree, a copy of Elizabeth Bates’ Language and Context: the Acquisition of
Pragmatics arrived in the mail. It took a few days to skim the book’s
chapters, but then – I heard the voice exiting the stage… “That’s what therapy
is all about, Charlie Brown”. Pragmatics, a hybrid born of philosophy, sociology and
linguistics, led me to discover that for me, the object of therapy was establishing
then following the rules of your context. You do good therapy by constructing and
nurturing the environment that best grows your client’s skills. The focus of my
treatment plans became – “in here, you do this”. How do I apply these concepts to
daily operations of a clinical CSD program?
In the present-day clinical environment, when I have to confront an
inattentive or resistant client I say in essence: “This is not your house. You
are here to (play/work on your goals/learn to speak [swallow] better.)” You reinforce clients who show they agree with
you. When you begin training generalization of target behaviors: “You are here
for only 1-2% of the entire time you are awake. How can you build a strong new
habit by just using 2% of your week?” If a client expresses reluctance to
generalize a skill e.g. drinking thickened liquids at home, my answer might be:
“When you leave here, I won’t know what you do. All this work is not for me but
for you. You’ve seen this has worked. We’ll do our best to get you back to
regular liquids”. I learned how to say “What I Want to Do….” I learned how to
help my patient focus in the moment, to respect the therapeutic environment and
use it as intended, and to bring the most energy possible to each time we meet.
That’s what it’s all about.
(originally submitted in different form to ASHAsphere, the blog of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association)
Thank you. I find this very helpful and practical and plan to use it in caring for my own patients.
ReplyDelete