Be a Healer

"Healing" is dramatic; it calls upon that suspension of disbelief, cited in English literature, to give your body, mind and soul to an agent that displays powers you don't understand. You trust the authority of the agent, and your trust in what the agent offers is the voice you hear, above others, in your head. Heal me, please heal me. Far from healing being antiseptic, peaceful or conclusive, it can be raucous, sweaty and wrapped in mystery. I want to be healed; I have to be healed; I will do almost anything to be healed.  I give up my body, or my mind to you to be healed. I will pour out my gratitude and my devotion - my FEALTY to you, when I am healed. Please heal me!                                                                                                                                                                                              

Healing is also seen as cerebral, data-driven. The legacy of disease hunters and their conquest of rabies, polio and measles, is a series of complimenting clinical trials and omnivorous
"running"of subjects, defining cohorts, piling up data, checking hypotheses, building the large "N", deciding if this is the key that fits the lock, determining if this is the trial that allows the word "proof" to be used, and scouring the sources for every spare dime to complete every last task. This is not only the place for lab rats and lab bench jockeys, but for IRB meetings, for grant writers, for bleary eyes staring at computer screens, for family members bringing their loved ones to a trial, for repetition/repetition/repetition, and for building your CV with paper after paper. Heal you? There's an RCT for that. You want to be healed? Hospital A, where I work, has doctors who do that. You're not in network? Too bad. Healing is technical. Healing is business. Heal me! I can pay. Until I see the final bill, I am sure I can pay.

Speech-language pathologists can be and are healers. When they are at their best, "speechies" embody both the technical and the emotive. They exemplify the data-driven and the life-affirming. They appeal to the human need as well as the scientific method. Clinicians do it by playing the games that entail effective treatment plan management: they elicit the goals of the persons served and keep that goal uppermost for each person; they demonstrate continuously evolving project management skills ("Are we on the right track?", you ask. "Are we doing the right thing? Do YOU feel we are making progress?"), using both near-point perception and disinterested data to guide the project towards its planned conclusion; and they follow Covey's commandment, begin with the end in mind; they find the bridge between treating the impairment with component skills training, and using the functional skill in real life environments as soon as possible.

The SLP as healer should not be "puffed up" or oversell her/his skill, product, or project. If you look at Oliver Cromwell's statement to the Church of Scotland, "....think it possible you may be mistaken", converted to a statistical rule named for the English leader, you may see that healing in the clinical sphere is a function of science and faith. You may learn that, to be a clinical healer, you depend as much upon your human connection to the person served, as you do upon the rigor and predictability of your method. You may discover that in serving persons with communication, cognition and swallowing impairments, - that they appreciate your education and training, but they merely want to be healed.

Be a scholar

Above and beyond being "well read", as the August 27, 2017 post for this blog urges ; -
speech-language pathologists must have the constitution to link what they do in the treatment setting, to the grand body of cumulative knowledge on human communication, cognition and swallowing. You don't do that because you want a car on the professional ego train, or that you want to keep up the momentum you had in university for setting the curve. Some scholars can do both - climb the ladder of riches, while working as a clinician/researcher/academic. Basic and applied research in our fields, is regardless, THE reward if you seek to answer a scholarly question. Whether to understand the processes underlying behavior within the population, or to discover valid and reliable, real life solutions for impaired individuals -scholarly endeavor gives us clinicians the credibility we need, in the marketplace for human service.

This post will not teach you nearly enough fundamentals of scholarly research: there are literature reviews, books, convention presentations and courses, post-doctoral fellowships and master's level internships, already in place and accessible to all with interest and drive. There is quantitative research, where discrete data collection and rigorous statistical method allow you to establish proof of a phenomenon in human communication sciences. That school of thought is well represented by training programs such as - https://communication.northwestern.edu/departments/csd/research

Qualitative research will approach human communication phenomena from a largely descriptive perspective: "...a variety of analytic procedures designed to systematically collect and describe authentic, contextualized social phenomena with the goal of interpretive adequacy”. 

Damico, J. S., & Simmons-Mackie, N. N. (2003). Qualitative research and speech-language pathology: A tutorial for the clinical realm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 131–143.

An example of a training program that affords the budding researcher experience in qualitative research methods is -  http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~jsd6498/codi610/codi610page.html

 Regardless of your method, - you will have occasion to use both paradigms in the course of your career, - identifying and attacking a research problem using scholarship can light you up. It can ignite or revitalize your career. It can save the world! It will feel that good.

Be a servant

If you look back at the March 27, 2016 entry for this blog, "Who Exactly Are We?", you will find three examples of a skill set typical of speech-language pathologists. Because many of us in the professions drift from a strictly clinical role to one that melds clinic practice with mentoring, management or administration, you might ask - do any combinations of the skill sets bring you the greatest success as a leader? Leadership is not only a vital component of our workplaces - it can satisfy a need many of us clinicians have for professional growth, and it can be enjoyable to give above and beyond the therapy room.

Let's cross match a sample of the clinical skills, with some traits of a good leader,
 to find out what leadership is for you .

About leaders: Jill Geisler addressed this skill set for successful managers, posted to poynter.org on 12/6/2012:

1. Strategic thinking
2.  Collaboration
3. Emotional Intelligence
4. Critical Thinking
5. Communication
6. Motivation
7. Feedback
8. Tough Conversations
9. Coaching
10.Making Values Visible and Viral

Now here is a skill set for speech-language pathologists, taken from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) website. 

1. Teachable
2. Strong ethics
3. Good communication skills
4. Capable technologically
5. Conversant with good business practice
6. Entrepreneurship
7. Social consciousness
8. Civility
9. Objectivity
10. Analytic ability
11. Patience
12. System advocacy
13. Positive
14. Strong values

And so we begin to see clues about how the twain might meet, between clinicians and leaders. We might be seen as leaders for our customers, the persons we serve, in that we must communicate clearly our proposed plans; we must coordinate the changes in behavior we are managing, with their effects on the persons served and their communities; and we must manage the case efficiently, meeting the planned objectives on time and budget. We are, then, trained in the clinical setting to be proactive managers of behavioral change, in addition to steering one ship among a fleet of education or health services in the marketplace.

Folding leadership traits for coordination, action, discipline, project management and helmet fit, into the clinical skills for project management, clinical alliance management, sales acumen and scientific rigor, we have a batter rich in organization, flavored with business sense and heightened by brand new whiz bang tech. Is there enough of the humanity of being a clinician? DO you find enough sustenance in such an mixture to get you through tough days, to sustain the buy-in of your persons served?

What about the servant leader; one whose leadership style is built upon "ethical and caring behavior"?  Its skill set might include (Spears, 2010):

1. Listening
2. Empathy
3. Healing
4. Awareness
5. Persuasion
6. Conceptualization
7. Foresight
8. Stewardship
9. Commitment to the growth of people
10. Building community

When this concoction is formed and the elements seared in, you might find that the result has elements of a skill set that allow you a tighter alliance, a clearer vision, and a human scale approach to the management of cases - and the perpetuity of clinical services.

What do you carry in your skill set bag? How much do you borrow and share from all three domains? Your servant.

Be a geek

"Oh YES, they call her the geek;
All her test data is on fleek;
She can treat from Sholem to Sadiq,
But keep a super mystique; - 
Yes, she's an SLP GEEK!"
(with apologies to Ray Stevens)

Even though there are minute distinctions to be made among geeks, nerds, dweebs and dorks, I feel the need to use only one of these discerning terms when describing an SLP who loves to dabble in the arcana of the work we do. The colorful Venn diagram you see below shows that a geek melds the best of "intelligence" and "obsession", in forming her world view of - in this case - the professions.

Would a dweeb make it as a clinician? Running the gauntlet of practicum classes, then an internship or two, then the CFY - ?! How about a dork? The endless cycles of push - pull, of Lucy saying, "Ricky, I want to sing with your band!", then finding out she doesn't have the pipes for the work, would be exhausting...and let's just forget the nerd; at the mercy of all these forces in the Venn diagram, you may as well be a - an elocutionist!

Geek = intelligence + obsession. You solve problems and you want to do it so badly. The culture of training, our business models and our practice patterns all breed geekness. When your practice is expected to be evidence - based, that means hypotheses to test; variables to be juggled; sample sizes to optimize; literature to review and conclusions to weigh. We want to be smart in solving the problems, that persons served bring to our offices to solve. We want to put in the hours; the weeks, months, semesters, years, to make our profession more than the best kept secret in town."Are we not men? We are geeks!".

Be well read

I didn't start wearing corrective lenses until I had turned 21. For years and years (it seems an eternity when you are young - becoming an adult) I had read, read and read some more. I had read at school; at home in every orientation in space; in the library; in the car; and wherever else I could make a book's world my own. There were board books and chapter books; books read aloud, books on cassette and then those portrayed on TV, encouraging me to read them; books out of library stacks that needed immaculate protection, those that were issued by my school and required a pristine look at turn-in; and my own constantly mutating collection of books. It was so much fun to be a reader from an early age. The apocryphal story in my family was that I had learned to read before I finally talked. True or not;  I was a reading guy, and it was such a fuel for my life. The tortoise shell frames with my first glasses at 21; - they were just my attempt at a first fashion statement, after being able to read with less eye strain.

Reading is, of course, a discipline that is obligatory to begin and sustain your SLP career. If a clinician-researcher does not master the skills to digest not only the source material for core professional knowledge, but also the allied and supplementary material from fields deemed interprofessional - sharing some knowledge base with SLP - the marketability of the SLP will be marginal. Many in the field want to be specialists, whether that be in autism, augmentative/alternative communication, aphasiology, assistive technology, or additional specialties. Those professionals who want to "drill down" and understand in depth, a narrow focus for professional practice, will have their niche firmly in hand when they read all the necessary literature with fluency. The alternate end of this continuum of professional readers, may hold the generalist who has, out of human nature's demands, some professional strengths but is also prepared to serve anyone who seeks out this practice. Reading by the generalist allows access to knowledge bases across the entire professional spectrum, and in general, superior research skills that facilitate working with all persons having the needs of a well read SLP clinician.

Yet, even beyond the professional reading that the SLP clinician carries as a perpetual responsibility - there is the need and obligation to read for work-life balance, for pleasure, and for growing as a literate professional who can engage with most persons served. I have regularly heard from my fellow students and colleagues, that they do not have time to read outside the professional sphere. I often do not directly respond, but that is because I have had to lift my mandible off the ground and reattach to my jaw. I would go BONKERS BAT CRAZY if I did not pick up newspapers, magazines and books, in addition to all the professional reading I do. Besides feeding my incessant curiosity about the world, reading prepares me to be more like the people I serve. When I have built up my store of general education, I am better prepared to relate well to persons seeking my services; - to find their areas of interest and establish connections based on what the person and I share. So read, read, read, my colleagues - read everything!

Be a CNA!

Back in the day, they called the position "orderly". There were meal trays to pass, trash cans to keep empty, pre-operative shaves for male patients, and room lights to answer for the nurses. In the first full time job I had assumed after high school, I was an orderly in the county general hospital - thanks largely to my grandmother, on the nursing staff and one of my most powerful moral compasses. "Monie" knew I needed not just a job, but a job that challenged my emotional and social architecture. There had been a part-time stint of bagging groceries at the Kroger, but I was such an unfocused dweeb at that - also, my trig teacher had been a supervisor at the store, so GEEZ - what a blemish on my future if I had tried to stay! I couldn't not be successful at this hospital job, and at $1.65/hour - I had it all. Money in my pocket. Nurses and aides to keep me constantly moving and teach me things. Hostess fruit pies and Pepsi's for lunch! Any thought of my future career was at the time, only a nugget of light I didn't know I owned deep in my consciousness. Working as an orderly/CNA was a life pivot that, now, I wouldn't trade for all the stock options littering Wall Street.

On the one hand, why would you rhapsodize about a job where you were on the bottom of the hospital pecking order? An SLP is trained and conditioned to work with and communicate with doctors, nurses, psychologists, educators, parents, rad technologists and the like. You are entrusted to be in most settings, semi-autonomous and self-driven to manage your caseload and advocate for persons served. The orderly was instead, task- and criterion-driven to work down a checklist of responsibilities for a shift. Making beds with sharp hospital corners! Collecting meal trays for dietary staff!  Collecting, as an elderly Italian-American man once offered up, the "UREEN" for the lab! Yet, as I learned the job on a urology ward and later in the hospital's ER, then in a university hospital (ENT ward, general surgery clinic) and nursing home in Iowa - there was so much more.

With more and more work experience, I made the transition from completing non-medical to routine medical tasks. With knowledge I had accumulated about the medical conditions of persons served, I got the chance to assist nurses and doctors in frequent procedures. Catheter placements! Staple removal!! Nasogastric tube feeding!!! I learned to be vigilant for persons' needs - whether physical or emotional. I was pulled out of my shy dweeb shell, when forced to check in frequently with those persons assigned to me: as a result, I grew to know each person very well. I got to know the units on which these persons were housed very well, too. As a speech -language pathologist that will engage with these facilities, whether they are medical or long-term care, I respect the direct care staff and seek their advice for best care of the person served.

And so, WHY do I feel privileged to have been a CNA?  The skill set that grew out of those work experiences includes:

* physical effort in patient care, higher than that of most SLP's: hard physical work feels good!
* work processes of high frequency, that extend across diagnostic categories to meet criteria of a treatment plan: you can have a lot of pride in work that is repetitive and of low complexity.
* interpersonal communication experiences across ages, both genders and all socioeconomic tiers: when people are ill or convalescing, having someone to listen to them can spur healing. 
* being THE direct care staff who knows the person served very well, and serves as an advocate for them with the healthcare system: frequent attention to the person served only strengthens the therapeutic alliance. 

 

Be an SLP!

The types and numbers of persons who join the professions - they are as infinite as the number of points between any two points. And, even though this blog has attempted to point out what's what about being a speech-language pathologist, it's extremely difficult to capture all the relevant skill sets and perspectives that people like me employ. So,we'll have another series of short posts following this one, that give you new, fresh and tasty views of what is means to be an SLP!

Coming from an individual SLP; this is, of course, a personal view. The paths that many of our professions' founders followed, as well as those of some of our colleagues, to nurture and grow the mission of service to our communities....what a long, strange trip it's been.

During my graduate training, an earlier review text for the national credentialling exam (PRAXIS) was Perkins' SPEECH PATHOLOGY: An Applied Interdisciplinary Behavioral Science. Interdisciplinary: that's the rub. People have come to wear the clinical cloak from the whole world. Everyone communicates and swallows, and we'll give some examples of perspectives on the field in succeeding posts. The topics will ask if you would be a CNA; someone well read; a geek; a servant; an entrepreneur; a team player, a conscience; a good citizen; a healer or a scholar. It's such a big world, that brings the next generation of practitioner/researchers to lead our fields.

What do you bring to the worktable? Looking forward to responses from readers of this blog, about what makes a quality SLP.